Skip to main content

When the Tide Returns : On trust, the lag in policy, and why a little optimism is finally warranted

There is a line I have quoted before, and I will lean on it once more because it has not stopped being true. You only find out who has been swimming naked when the tide goes out. A few weeks ago I wrote that the tide was going out on Indonesia, and I spent most of that essay worrying about what we were about to find out. The rupiah had just broken through Rp17,300. Reserves were thinning. The ratings agencies had begun to frown. I argued then for the unglamorous things, a measured rate hike, a patient rescaling of the budget, and a single voice between the government and Bank Indonesia, because those are the things that decide whether a country is wearing anything when the water leaves.

The water has gone out further since then. As I write, the rupiah sits at roughly Rp18,000 to the dollar, a level it touched for the first time this past week. So this is, in part, a confession that my worries were not misplaced. But it is also something I did not expect to be writing so soon. It is an argument that the picture underneath the price has begun to look better than the price itself, and that for the first time in months I find a small, carefully measured optimism to be the honest position rather than the naive one.

Let me build that case slowly, the way I prefer to, starting with what is real and ending with what I merely suspect.

What the price is saying, and what it is not

The rupiah at Rp18,000 is a real number and a painful one. On June 4 it closed at Rp18,049, the weakest level on record, after sliding another 82 points in a single session. I will not dress this up. A currency does not fall to an all-time low because everything is fine.

But a price is a verdict on sentiment as much as on substance, and the two are not always the same witness. Most of the pressure on the rupiah this past month has come from outside our own fence. The Federal Reserve has kept its policy rate high enough that the dollar remains the world's most comfortable place to wait out uncertainty, with the dollar index hovering around 99.4. The conflict in the Middle East has refused to settle, with fresh flare-ups between Israel and Lebanon keeping a permanent bid under safe-haven assets. And oil has stayed expensive because the world's shipping lanes are nervous. For a net oil importer like Indonesia, that last point is not abstract. Every dollar added to a barrel of crude eventually finds its way into fuel, freight, electricity, fertilizer, and the price of almost everything that must be moved or processed.

So when I look at Rp18,000, I do not see a referendum on Indonesia alone. I see a global storm in which the rupiah happens to be standing outdoors, alongside most of its emerging-market peers. That distinction matters, because storms pass and structural rot does not. The question worth asking is not how loud the wind is, but whether the house behind us is sound.

The fiscal house, examined honestly

This is where the conversation usually turns to feeling, so let me insist on numbers instead, because today we were handed a fresh set of them.

In the pers conference this afternoon, the Minister of Finance laid out where the budget actually stands through the end of May. The deficit came in at Rp180.4 trillion, which is 0.70 percent of GDP for the first five months of the year. To put that in the context that markets have been fretting about, the legal ceiling is 3 percent, and the year-end projection that had everyone nervous a month ago was brushing against 2.9 percent. A 0.70 percent reading five months in does not, on its own, look like a country losing control of its accounts. It looks like a country keeping its footing.

The detail I find more persuasive than the headline deficit is the primary balance. Strip out interest payments, and the budget is actually running a surplus of Rp58.6 trillion, up from Rp28 trillion in April. A primary surplus means that, setting aside the legacy cost of old debt, the state is taking in more than it spends. That is the difference between a household that is borrowing to pay this month's groceries and one that is borrowing only to service a mortgage on a house it already owns. The market often forgets to make that distinction. It should not.

Underneath that sits the revenue line, which is the part I have wanted to see improve for years. State revenue reached Rp1,185.0 trillion through May, growing 19.1 percent year over year, and tax revenue alone grew 22.1 percent. I have complained in the past that Indonesia's tax-to-GDP ratio sits embarrassingly low for an economy our size, and that we have spent two decades discussing reform without doing the collection. A 22 percent jump in tax receipts does not erase that history, but it is the most encouraging revenue signal I have seen in some time, and it arrives at exactly the moment the country needs to show it can fund itself without leaning ever harder on the bond market.

I want to be careful not to oversell this. Spending grew faster than revenue, rising 34.4 percent year over year to Rp1,365.4 trillion, which is why the deficit exists at all. The quality of that spending, and whether it funds capacity or merely consumption, remains the real long-run question, and I have written elsewhere about why borrowing to invest earns patience from lenders while borrowing to consume earns suspicion. But the overall posture, by the government's own figures presented today, is responsive and intact. The Minister put it plainly, that the fiscal position is genuinely being guarded, and for once the arithmetic supports the claim rather than contradicting it. He also made the point, almost in passing, that a rupiah at Rp18,000 has not impaired the government's ability to service its debt. On the numbers, that is true.

So my verdict on the fiscal side is the same one I reached weeks ago, only with more confidence behind it now. Not perfect. Not beyond criticism. But reasonably sound, and tightening rather than loosening its discipline at the moment it matters most.

The monetary house, and the lag inside it

On the monetary side, the effort has been real even if the results are not yet visible at the checkout counter. Inflation came in at 3.08 percent, comfortably inside Bank Indonesia's target band of 2.5 percent give or take one. That is not an accident. It is the product of a central bank that has kept policy tight, intervened in the market to keep the rupiah's slide from turning into a rout, and leaned on the requirement that exporters park their proceeds at home so the domestic supply of dollars grows thicker.

None of these are silver bullets, and I would not pretend otherwise. Intervention buys time, not solutions. Tight rates restrain inflation at the cost of growth. The rule on export proceeds thickens the dollar pool slowly, not overnight. What they amount to, taken together, is a foundation rather than a finished house. And a foundation is precisely the thing you cannot see from the street, which is part of why the market has not yet priced it.

This is the heart of why I am willing to build a little optimism. Economic policy behaves like medicine. You swallow it today and feel it weeks later. The decisions being made now, the discipline on the deficit, the surplus in the primary balance, the tightness in monetary policy, are not yet reflected in a price that is busy reacting to today's headlines from the Middle East. There is a lag between cause and consequence, and we are living inside that lag right now.

The thing money cannot buy

If I have a single worry that outweighs the others, it is not in any of these numbers. It is in the one thing that is hardest to purchase and most expensive when it is gone, which is trust.

Markets move not only on facts but on the story people believe about those facts, and sentiment travels faster than data ever will. When one investor grows nervous, his neighbor catches it, and before long that nervousness has hardened into a price on a screen that then frightens the next person in line. This is why an all-time low in the rupiah can coexist with a primary surplus and 22 percent revenue growth. The fundamentals and the mood have come unstuck from each other.

The uncomfortable truth is that no single press conference repairs this. Trust is built slowly, withdrawn in an afternoon, and rebuilt only through the boring repetition of doing the sensible thing and being seen to do it. The data released today is a deposit into that account. So was the government's decision to sit down with S&P this week and walk them through the books before the agency delivers its verdict this month, rather than waiting to be judged from a distance. These are small, unglamorous acts of credibility-building. They are also, in my experience, exactly the acts that eventually turn sentiment, even though they never make a dramatic headline.

Why I am reading the direction, not the date

Here is where I have to be honest about the limits of what anyone can know.

A month ago I might have been tempted to name a month on the calendar when things would turn, and I have since decided that would make me a fortune-teller rather than an analyst, which is a profession I have no talent for and less interest in. So I will not do it. I do not know when the turn comes. What I know is that the conditions for it are quietly being put in place, and that when the lag between policy and price finally closes, the rupiah and the IHSG should be standing on firmer ground than they are today. Asking exactly when is the wrong question. Asking whether the direction is right is the better one, and on the evidence in front of me, the direction is right.

I am also wary, as I always am, of the temptation toward dramatic action that tends to surface at moments like this. There will be calls for capital controls, for emergency stimulus, for confrontational language aimed at foreign investors who are merely doing the arithmetic that their mandates require. Each carries a certain political appeal and each, as far as I can see, would be a mistake. Capital controls would burn decades of hard-won credibility in a quarter. Emergency stimulus would worsen the very fiscal anxiety that started this. Confrontation would accelerate the outflows it claims to prevent. The right response to a storm is not theater. It is boring competence, repeated until the weather changes.

A closing thought

I did not expect, when I wrote about the outgoing tide a few weeks ago, that I would be reaching for a more hopeful conclusion this soon. I closed that essay by saying that what we look like when the tide goes out is, in the end, up to us. The water has receded further since then, and for the first time in months, what I see when I look down does not make me want to turn away.

The discipline I asked for then, imperfect as it remains, has begun to show itself in the figures rather than merely in the speeches. The deficit is contained. The primary balance has turned positive. Revenue is growing at a pace I have waited years to see. Inflation is inside its band. None of this guarantees that next week's price will be kind, because prices answer to the mood of the moment and the mood is still frightened. But beneath the mood, the fundamentals are quietly doing their work.

Fear shouts loudest just before things begin to improve, and prices usually move ahead of the good news that explains them. Pessimism is the market's most faithful companion and also its most expensive one. I choose to stand a little to the other side, with my eyes open and my feet on the ground. That, for me, is enough to build a little optimism. Not a lot. Just a little. But built on something real, which is the only kind worth having.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Iranian Regime: Thank You, Netanyahu and Trump

How a Foreign Bombardment Rescued a Dying Theocracy from Its Own People To the observers of geopolitical folly:   In my years of studying how value is created and destroyed, I have learned that the most expensive mistakes are not the ones born of ignorance. They are the ones born of certainty. When someone is absolutely sure they are right, they tend to bet the whole farm. And when the farm in question happens to be the Middle East, the bill arrives not in dollars alone but in lives, stability, and consequences that compound for generations. On February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launched Operation Epic Fury against Iran. The stated objectives were ambitious: dismantle Iran’s nuclear program, neutralize its ballistic missile capabilities, and—though officials danced around the word—effect regime change. The opening salvo killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei himself, along with dozens of senior officials. By any military scorecard, this was a spectacular opening move. ...

When the Tide Goes Out: Notes on a Currency Under Pressure

Some thoughts on Indonesia, on what 1998 and 2013 might still have to teach us, and on why the boring answers are usually the right ones There is a line I keep returning to whenever markets get nervous. You only find out who has been swimming naked when the tide goes out. It is a glib phrase, but the principle behind it has stayed with me for years. When money is cheap and capital is abundant, every economy looks competent. Every government looks prudent. Every central bank looks wise. It is only when the world tightens its belt that we discover which countries built their houses on rock and which on sand. The tide is going out on Indonesia right now. I find myself thinking a great deal about what we are about to find out. By late April 2026, the rupiah had broken through Rp17,300 per dollar. Foreign reserves had fallen to USD 148.2 billion, the lowest since mid-2024. Bank Indonesia had spent USD 8.3 billion in the first quarter alone defending the currency. Moody's and Fitch had r...

Annual Letter 1

I am writing this letter as a personal record of learning rather than a summary of achievements. It is not meant to impress, nor to justify choices that may appear unconventional from the outside. Its purpose is simpler: to document how I thought, what I learned, and how I intend to move forward. I have come to value honest reflection over polished narratives. This letter is written in that spirit. The year 2025 unfolded in three distinct phases. Each phase demanded a different kind of attention and a different kind of discipline. Early in the year, my focus was intellectual learning how different asset classes work and how capital behaves over time. Midway through the year, the focus shifted inward, toward relationships and emotional openness within my family. Toward the end of the year, I made a personal decision that closed one chapter of my life and clarified the direction of the next several years. None of these phases felt dramatic while they were happening. Their importance ...